4 ms·
Or they could make it less tedious. Or change it in any number of ways.
by wccrawford 2y ago
Or they could make it less tedious. Or change it in any number of ways.
- grahamjameson 2y agoAny number of ways also includes more tedious. There are already a lot of workers effectively performing QA on ML/AI verdicts (e.g., object recognition, malware analysis).
- Joker_vD 2y agoWell, we all know what e.g. introduction of typewriters, and then the desk computers with printers did to the paperwork-related jobs, don't we?
- DaiPlusPlus 2y agoI can’t be the only one who finds the lack of power-user automation of web-applications in 2024 surprising. When you compare Windows (and MacOS) desktop applications to web-applications, what stands-out is that web-apps get automation “for free” - whereas desktop apps needed significant investment in COM Automation / AppleScript to be user-automatable. Obviously the problem is that the user’s agent (i.e. their web-browser) does not come with a Macros Explorer or VBA Editor, which hinders entry for novices (no, Browser Extensions aren’t the same). It is unfortunate that no browser vendor is economically incentivised to build-out this functionality - instead users get steered towards cloud(TM)-hosted, non-browser-based automation systems like PowerAutomate - or hit a brick-wall-learning-curve in building a browser extension.