> Depending on how you twist the words this could crush a satire completely. This can crush freedom of artistic expression. This is ripe for abuse because it's

> Depending on how you twist the words this could crush a satire completely. This can crush freedom of artistic expression. This is ripe for abuse because it's so emotionally charged is why you get a unanimous but vote. Who's fear-mongering now? If you read the bill you'll see that to be liable 1) it must depict an intimate scene, 2) it must be done knowingly, 3) it must be indistinguishable from a real person and 4) it must be done without their consent. That's a pretty reasonable standard IMO. This certainly doesn't include political speech or satire, unless your satire must include photorealistic porn.