3 ms·
Well, I'm sure there's all sorts of interesting nuclear physics to be learned like island of stability stuff, but given the context of who's doing this work and
by vikramkr 2y ago
Well, I'm sure there's all sorts of interesting nuclear physics to be learned like island of stability stuff, but given the context of who's doing this work and competing for credit - I guess even out of the cold war context it's a great way to show that 1) my country is better than your country at nuclear physics get rekt or 2) my country and your country get along now, look at us do nuclear physics together or 3) what's up, new player here, btw I'm also good at nuclear physics check out this element I found.
Or in this case 4) oh no your country and my country don't get along anymore! time to asset scientific dominance by "re entering the super heavy race" (https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-back-race-forge-unknown-superheavy-elements https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-back-race-forge-...) and getting the department of energy to start funding this again so we're back on top.
- ForOldHack 2y agoSeriously: this is one of the very most important topics in physics today. It is not written of discussed nearly enough. My father was part of an international team, ignored in the U.S. and worshipped internationally. I would assign the noun- royal pita. I read every article I come across about this, and I would strongly encourage you to write more. What upsets me is politics getting in the way of science.
- AmericanChopper 2y agoI'm not sure I get what you're saying here. Competing with Russians over heavy element synthesis is one of the very most important topics in physics today? What is the actual scientific value of the research, what do we learn from it? Is it just that one day we might find a stable element?