The act's text: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3696/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/369... It modifies

The act's text: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3696/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/369... It modifies US Code section 6851: Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate images http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15%20section:6851%20edition:prelim) http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15%20section:6... The existing law allows a person with standing to bring a civil action against distributors of commercial pornography. This act amends that to not just include the commercial pornographer having actual pictures/video of the person, but also if they generate realistic pictures/video of the person. Hitler and Braun are both dead, so they lack standing. Falwell's case did not include an "intimate visual depiction" so he also couldn't bring a civil action under this section of the code. The requirement of "intimitate visual depiction" would also let you away with Katy Perry's fruit consumption, and provided there are no genitals, anuses, sexual fluids, etc. you could depict Jackman and McGinley... you could also be safe and render it as a cartoon, as the depiction has to be "indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual"