4 ms·
Isn't it just a name? A user can easily enable the developer tools if needed, same way I'm not a mechanic but can open the hood of my car.
by pcardoso 2y ago
Isn't it just a name?
A user can easily enable the developer tools if needed, same way I'm not a mechanic but can open the hood of my car.
- steve1977 2y agoYou can open the hood of your car, but there’s probably not much you can do there.
- pcardoso 2y agoOf course I can. Add cleaning water, check oil levels, replace a light bulb. No much else I can do, but others may, and other won't even do any of this. Point is, this is not a binary choice. Between user and developer there are many people with varying skills that will use a user-agent switcher if needed.
- philistine 2y agoIt’s not about capability, it’s about interest. Most people could do a bit under the hood of a car, but they simply don’t care. It’s the same thing with computers. Most users are savvy. They just don’t care.
- steve1977 2y agoIn my experience (systems engineer/devops for both Windows and Linux for more than 25 years), very few users are actually savvy. Even those working in tech.
- philistine 2y agoOur definition of savvy probably differs.
- steve1977 2y agoThat is possible. Mine would be more or less "someone who knows what they're doing"