4 ms·
At least, the bias is overt here. And winning four times in 42 years and almost as many editions isn't a conclusive proof of vote tampering, in my opinion.
by a-french-anon 2y ago
At least, the bias is overt here. And winning four times in 42 years and almost as many editions isn't a conclusive proof of vote tampering, in my opinion.
- daghamm 2y agoNobody has won more times