4 ms·
>I would like to live in a world where crowdstrike is directly liable for every dollar lost and has to pay for all of it. That wouldn't make any sense. The bl
by whoknowsidont 2y ago
>I would like to live in a world where crowdstrike is directly liable for every dollar lost and has to pay for all of it.
That wouldn't make any sense.
The blame realistically lies within each company who allowed a critical point of failure just so they get checkbox software and not actually have to expend the effort of making sure the company is able to function with their chosen infrastructure.
- margalabargala 2y agoExactly. The customer is to blame here, not the seller. Buyer beware. If airlines skimp on maintenance and planes crash, well, all those dead passengers should have picked an airline that takes maintenance more seriously. Next time they'll know better.
- autoexecbat 2y agoIt shouldn't be one or the other, but both
- jjav 2y ago> Next time they'll know better. No next time, they're dead, so not a good selection criteria. Agreed that both sides share some liability, but a vendor that says they create security software with root level code injection access must be held to the highest possible standard, and liability. If someone puts up a shack and sells hamburgers and hundreds of people die from the rotten meat, they most certainly are liable. But apparently crowsdstrike can brick computers remotely, causing enormous damage including some deaths, and just say oopsie and walk away without any liability.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]