2 ms·

This may end up being the answer, to be honest. I am very into cars; but my tastes lean strongly towards the impractical (hence the two-seater).

• ruslan 18y ago
  Why two-seaters ? For $50k you can buy a fscking big SUV :-). I myself am a happy owner of 3-doors Mitsubishi Pajero (Montero) 3.2 turbo diesel with climat, GPS navigation, TV/DVD and rear-veiw camera. It fits everything in it pretty well, including my huge fridge I once tranported to repair-store :). And it's very moderate on fuel consumption as any other diesel made in japan.
  • Zak 18y ago
    Many car enthusiasts like cars with quick acceleration and responsive handling. Since A=F/M, that tends to mean cars that weigh less than average. Cars with fewer seats and less, well... car tend to weigh less.
• mechanical_fish 18y ago
  Impractical, eh? My racing friend has a trailer that he tows behind his Honda S2000. Get one of those and your luggage problems will be over, in a gloriously impractical fashion. Incidentally, the Miata and the S2000 seem to be pretty fun cars, although I'm too tall for one and too cheap for the other. When I lived in CA I owned a 1986 Toyota MR2; that was lots of fun too, and with a gloriously quirky mid-80s dated look. Bought it for like $6k, and it ran flawlessly, perhaps because it was a Toyota, but more likely because it had been cared for by an obsessive car person for a decade and a half. I salute that guy. Gratify your tastes! To hell with mere practicality! Give a cabbie $100 and have him to go pick up your friend at the airport! ;)
  • deleted 18y ago
    [deleted]
• deleted 18y ago
  [deleted]