61 ms·
Sure. That's a major over-correction. But there are existing and known biases in data sources that need to be accounted for - you don't want to further perpetua
by cthalupa 2y ago
Sure. That's a major over-correction. But there are existing and known biases in data sources that need to be accounted for - you don't want to further perpetuate those.
I think it's obvious that Google went to a ridiculous extreme in the other direction, but there does need to be some amount of work done here. For example, we repeatedly have seen that just changing the name on a resume to something more European sounding can have significant impact on callback rates when applying to a job, and if you trained a model to screen resumes based on your own resume result data, this bias could be picked up by the model. That's the sort of situation these are meant to correct for.