4 ms·
Intel is looking really skeevy on this. Won't them lying and downlplaying bite them harder? How is this level of misrepresenting and covering up not criminal?
by sqeaky 2y ago
Intel is looking really skeevy on this. Won't them lying and downlplaying bite them harder? How is this level of misrepresenting and covering up not criminal?
EDIT - Why the downvotes? I seriously don't understand why they are doing it this way.
They have actively blamed other companies, like NVidia (not that I like them either, but they simply didn't cause this issue).
There are multiple teams claiming denied RMAs during the period Intel knew about the oxidation.
They didn't announce this until multiple outlets started talking about it.
They did 2 different announcements with different explanations and the more mild one first.
Their statements are contradictory at least in part.
This just isn't how people acting in good faith behave. Using intel's past behavior as an example they have previously handled problems. With spectre they were way more transparent and just published findinds on problems without hiding them for years.
- wmf 2y agoThey had to reduce safety margins to match AMD's performance. Now months later they still haven't completely debugged the problem so they are stalling. This is the downside of the "only the paranoid survive" attitude.
- sqeaky 2y agoI want to agree with you, but I don't think we really know enough to say this with certainty. What you propose is on of several plausible scenarios.