4 ms·
Let me be clear. Pay me to have children enough for them to live comfortably: I will have children. The reason is purely monetary. More money - more children.
by altruios 2y ago
Let me be clear. Pay me to have children enough for them to live comfortably: I will have children. The reason is purely monetary. More money - more children.
Ethics, philosophy, you can argue along those vectors all you want. It will be useless and moot.
The answer isn't 'let me change my mind about my opinions about sending a child into wage slavery' the answer is to 'convince me (with money) my child won't have to be a wage slave and having one won't make my family homeless due to financial strains; convince me that my child will have a good life'.
You want more children - pay up: 3C7tm5a1UMgsnwGF5GtYQazLxnG9y23v2B - btc address.
The answer really is as simple as: more money is needed.
- tonymet 2y agothankfully your great grandparents had better morals than you do
- altruios 2y agoI don't understand this thought. Is being childless immoral in your eyes? If so, why do you thank those that would bear (what you consider to be) an immoral agent into this world... I am seriously confused by this confusing remark. My grandparents had money to raise a family. I don't. Is them having more resources what makes them have better morals? Really: can you spell out explicitly what you are trying to say? The message is confusing, and unclear.
- tonymet 2y agoIf his grandparents were so money driven, the OP would not exist.