3 ms·
Salary in this case would serve as the consideration for the work they perform, but lawyers love making things as explicit as possible (understandably).
by Salgat 2y ago
Salary in this case would serve as the consideration for the work they perform, but lawyers love making things as explicit as possible (understandably).
- pests 2y agoYou already get salary though. They can't just keep adding contracts and terms and say it's covered by previous payments.
- Salgat 2y agoThey already paid you for the code, so it's already theirs, they are just making it explicitly stated. If you don't sign it, they end your employment. And the odds of them willing to lose employment over this and trying to claim the company's code as their own and that getting to court is near non-existent. But again as I said, lawyers like to make it explicit.
- pests 2y agoI agree with all of this, just my objections was to claiming the consideration being "the salary you already agreed to in order to sign your employee agreement" would not work therefore the token $20 amount.