3 ms·
The difference you are referring to was already asserted in your first comment. I'm afraid whatever you were trying to add here is being lost. Unless you were,
by randomdata 2y ago
The difference you are referring to was already asserted in your first comment. I'm afraid whatever you were trying to add here is being lost. Unless you were, strangely, straight up repeating yourself for no reason?
- betenoire 2y agolet me say in fewer words: >There is nothing to suggest that 1..100 understands math. That's like, your opinion man. I'd like it.
- randomdata 2y agoYou'd like what? For the type checker to understand math? We know that already. You said that in your first comment. And the second one. And the third one. And now seemingly the fourth one. But let it be known, whatever new information you are trying to add here is getting lost in translation.