3 ms·
This is exactly why we have build defguard (https://defguard.net https://defguard.net - https://github.com/defguard/defguard https://github.com/defguard/defguar
by teon 2y ago
This is exactly why we have build defguard (https://defguard.net https://defguard.net - https://github.com/defguard/defguard https://github.com/defguard/defguard).
From what I can tell you, good security is hard - we have prepared the product exactly as you describe on various levels (vpn, identity, SSO, Yubikey provisioning, etc) and prepared the architecture to be secure (multiple segments support: intranet, DMZ, proxy for exposing only public endpoints and functionalities publicly)…
What I observe in a year of the project being public and analysing heavily the landscape, similar projects, Reddit of what users are seeking and what problems they have is that: a lot of people and companies value comfort more then security (even if they will not admit it publicly), because security is hard. That also means there is w niche and need, but… it’s really hard to build a secure, easy to use and deploy security system…
Hope you don’t give up and peruse!, as it’s worth fighting about security and privacy
- generalizations 2y agoThis looks very nice. Comment: there's a whole industry that - whether or not they utterly despise the idea - is required to use FIPS-certified encryption. If you were somehow able to make that a component, you might be able to expand your market significantly.
- teon 2y agoYou are absolutely right! We already have this on our roadmap!
- BiteCode_dev 2y ago> (even if they will not admit it publicly) Saying you don't care about your user safety is actually often more costly than pretending you care, and then having a breach.
- elevation 2y agoDefguard looks great, it's got a similar architecture (local first, with a vpn) and your feature list looks like my todo list! I could see recommending this product to others! You have a few features that surprised me, like support for "authentication with crypto software and hardware wallets". This seems like the sort of thing a business would never need. Did you have users agitate for this feature? Or is it a direction you're trying to steer clients? Overall, nicely done, I wish I'd known about this when I started!
- teon 2y agoThose features you’ve mentioned were done for some customers/projects that deployed defguard - but web3 stack (especially wallet libraries) are so… immature and problematic that we will be most probably removing those features. Can you share your roadmap? Ideas? Seems we share the same mindset and vision, would be great to exchange knowledge, ideas… Cheers, Robert
- elevation 2y agoI sent you an email, would love to discuss!