3 ms·
> Seems like your comments are responding to a point in your head without anyone expressing such points. Again I urge the reductionists[1] to look in the mirro
by keybored 2y ago
> Seems like your comments are responding to a point in your head without anyone expressing such points.
Again I urge the reductionists[1] to look in the mirror.
> No one here is like the physicist in your example, so I am not even sure against whom you are arguing here.
Unless the original poster is a relevant expert like a biologist[2] the point stands.
You already agreed that it is thought-terminating—and justifiably so. I don’t get why you are still here.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41054500 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41054500
[2] Or could range all the way to a psychologist because it’s a pretty broad topic.
- satvikpendem 2y agoNo, they don't need to be a biologist to understand the current situation of physicalism versus dualism. Physicalism is extremely well established in the literature as compared to dualism, of which there is barely if any evidence. You are looking for a philosopher of the mind, not actually a biologist, who can speak on these issues, as biologists and indeed scientists in general are not philosophers, while the debate is philosophical in nature.
- keybored 2y agoThis physicalism/dualism obsession is besides the point.
- satvikpendem 2y agoNo? It is exactly what is being argued in this thread. If you have a different point to make, I'm not sure why you engaged in this specific thread, as there are many others that talk about the specifics of the article itself.
- keybored 2y agoIf you assert so. I have no interest in this supposed physicalism/dualism split since that’s a dead debate, at least as far this forum is concerned.[1] My pet-peeve was about the part about having understood everything, supposedly.[2] And if the point is so narrow as to be about Free Will then I don’t know why people are being coy and talking about input-output machines, washing machines and whatever. Just say that Free Will is not real. Then you get 70% less pushback. [1] No one here is going to argue for Cartesian Dualism. So the only way that it will come up as a supposedly “live” belief is if someone else accuses them of being a crypto-cartesian because of whatever reasons… [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41055373 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41055373
- satvikpendem 2y agoWell, it looks like you are in the wrong output then. That is not what most people here believe.