9 ms·

The actual proposal is short (9 pages including glossary) and linked in the article: https://db.wolfsberg-group.org/assets/e3d83d2f-fad9-46d2-b5a9-3cf4e932f53f/

The actual proposal is short (9 pages including glossary) and linked in the article: https://db.wolfsberg-group.org/assets/e3d83d2f-fad9-46d2-b5a9-3cf4e932f53f/Wolfsberg%20Group%20Statement%20on%20Effective%20Monitoring%20for%20Suspicious%20Activity.pdf https://db.wolfsberg-group.org/assets/e3d83d2f-fad9-46d2-b5a... I'd encourage you to draw your conclusions from the PDF rather than the journalist's interpretation.

thriftwy 2y ago
The text is opaque, but: > However, the Group believes strongly that the explicit focus on the provision of more highly useful information to relevant government agencies, and feedback from them on the information provided, will yield dividends in the form of more effective measures being taken against criminals and their illicit activity. So they want to superhighway all of your transactions to your government and then let it judge you without any due process. I don't see how that's any good.