2 ms·

OTOH installing insecure/unstable “security additions” on top of windows should be consider a terrible idea (ie making a bad situation worse). Our essential se

OTOH installing insecure/unstable “security additions” on top of windows should be consider a terrible idea (ie making a bad situation worse). Our essential services should be built on a more secure OS, if windows isn’t suitable.

thunky 2y ago
> OTOH installing insecure/unstable “security additions” on top of windows should be consider a terrible idea So it sounds like you agree that Crowdstrike should go bankrupt. > Our essential services should be built on a more secure OS, if windows isn’t suitable Oh wait you blame Windows for this?
- fuzzfactor 2y ago
  When an IBM mainframe was the routine system, well recognized as a single-point-of-failure, it wasn't a problem like this.
  - thunky 2y ago
    Hate to break it to you: - https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/crowdstrike-brings-xdr-to-z16-linuxone4-single-frame-and-rack-mount-models/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/crowdstrike-brings-xdr-to-z... - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7068083 https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7068083
    - fuzzfactor 2y ago
      smh, big iron is in the crosshairs and Linux to boot. Or maybe not to boot . . .