3 ms·
I have never _even once_ gone through the TSA naked scanner since they were put in after 9/11. A pat down is invasive, but the pat down is ephemeral by its own
by exabrial 2y ago
I have never _even once_ gone through the TSA naked scanner since they were put in after 9/11.
A pat down is invasive, but the pat down is ephemeral by its own nature.
Just wait until the TSA announces they trained an AI model on sorted naked images.
- prepend 2y agoThere are no “naked” images. Unless you consider x-rays and other similar imaging systems to create “naked” images.
- eesmith 2y ago"TSA dick detector" then.
- simoncion 2y ago> There are no “naked” images. Untrue. For years there absolutely were. <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tsa-full-body-scans-private-parts/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tsa-full-body-scans-privat...> > Unless you consider x-rays and other similar imaging systems to create “naked” images. These are used in medical scenarios with your fully-informed consent. TSA was absolutely not forthcoming about the capabilities of their checkpoint scanners, and they earned the moniker "pornoscanner" for a very good reason. Additionally, even ignoring the fact that most medical x-rays are used to look inside of you rather than at your skin (why would one use a fancy machine for a surface inspection when the Mk. 1 eyeball is Right There?), the context is completely different in a way that's very, very important.
- exabrial 2y agoThis is categorically false unfortunately. Peruse the government’s own website for proof.