3 ms·
> and in return Under Qian’s direction, Chinese researchers developed the first generation of “Long March” missiles The "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" fallacy in
by akira2501 2y ago
> and in return Under Qian’s direction, Chinese researchers developed the first generation of “Long March” missiles
The "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" fallacy in a single sentence.
- GranularRecipe 2y agoWhy do you think it's a fallacy? Do you think that he would have returned to China regardless of his treatment in the US, or do you think that his contribution is insignificant to China's missile programme? Or put it differently, how would it (counterfactually) not be a fallacy?