I'd be shocked if some regulation or massive fallout didn't happen from this. But at the same time, its most likely multiple failures that compounded to reach

I'd be shocked if some regulation or massive fallout didn't happen from this. But at the same time, its most likely multiple failures that compounded to reach this. How cloudstrike handles this will be showing. On one hand you can understand that cybersecurity is a fast paced enviorment and sometimes that means rapidly tweaking and updating your signature methodology and constantly creating new methods to identify threats. But on the other hand if those updated filters and identification techniques generate false positives you lose trust. Like someone said on YouTube its surprising they don't do slow rollout, but then when you consider how important some clients are.....I'd bet clients don't want to be stuck as an A/B tester when the new configs could be stopping potential threats. I'm newer to the security industry so please give me feedback on what my thought process is here, and any comments related to how you protect critical infrastructure in a rapidly changing threat environment.