3 ms·
The point still stands that YouTube does pay for content, it just does so in a semi unique way. I say semi unique because revenue share is common in traditiona
by dagmx 2y ago
The point still stands that YouTube does pay for content, it just does so in a semi unique way.
I say semi unique because revenue share is common in traditional content creation as well. So it’s not like YouTube is completely alone here , though it is rare for someone to go purely revenue share.
That said, YouTube has funded content creation directly as well in the past https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_Original_Channel_Initiative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_Original_Channel_Initi...
- paxys 2y agoI disagree. Paying for content, whether directly or indirectly, and being a platform that connects users/advertisers with content owners and takes a cut of all transactions are two very different business models. YouTube is very clearly the latter.