4 ms·

Would the comparison not be human drivers? If it's 99% percent reliable I would say that's far safer than humans and makes far more sense already? What am I mis

• oblio 2y ago
  People would rather die due to their action or inaction than due a botched software update somewhere.
• metalliqaz 2y ago
  It's not 99% reliable, but even if it was, the issue is lawyers. Who is going to take responsibility when a pedestrian is hit?
• Veserv 2y ago
  You think humans are only 99% reliable on a per-mile basis?! That would mean your average person crashes every ~100 miles, or about once every two days. You can not just go around asserting comparative advantage when your baseline is so far off it is farcical.
• alemanek 2y ago
  According to the link below there are 529 accidents per 100 million miles driven for people aged 20-29. That is a bit better than 99.999% reliable. Self driving needs to get down to 1 intervention in 200k miles to match the average 20 year old. They have a long way to go. https://www.friedmansimon.com/faqs/how-common-are-car-accidents/ https://www.friedmansimon.com/faqs/how-common-are-car-accide...