3 ms·
The CA did not forget the certificate if it's in their CT logs. The whole point of CT (unlike OCSP) is to make it impossible for a CA to forget what they've sig
by kmeisthax 2y ago
The CA did not forget the certificate if it's in their CT logs. The whole point of CT (unlike OCSP) is to make it impossible for a CA to forget what they've signed. If they forget to put a certificate in their CT logs, then the cert isn't valid. Anyone can download and retain copies of the logs, because they're signed and hash treed. Removing a cert after-the-fact is about as disruptive as editing Git history on Linus Torvalds' tree, meaning it will be incredibly obvious that the CA is trying to lie about what they signed.
The reason why OCSP forgets about certificates is that it was never intended to make CAs permanently remember every cert they ever signed. It was intended to replace CRLs with something less resource-intensive, except they screwed up the design, so it's now just a data siphon that provides little protection.
- agwa 2y agoCT doesn't tell you if a certificate is revoked, so the CA still has to operate a revocation system. That revocation system can forget about certificates.