4 ms·
Isn't the MIT license the generally accepted "open source" license? It's a community owned term, not OSI owned
by 8note 2y ago
Isn't the MIT license the generally accepted "open source" license? It's a community owned term, not OSI owned
- henryfjordan 2y agoThere are more licenses than just MIT that are "open source". GPL, BSD, MIT, Apache, some of the Creative Commons licenses, etc. MIT has become the defacto default though https://opensource.org/license https://opensource.org/license (linking to OSI for the list because it's convenient, not because they get to decide)
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y agoMIT is a permissive open source license, not the open source license.