4 ms·
Isn't that the charge he was cleared for?
by hermannj314 2y ago
Isn't that the charge he was cleared for?
- dralley 2y agoHe was cleared of espionage. He was not cleared for lying about the conflict of interest.
- Leary 2y agoThat conviction was overturned a week ago[1] [1] https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/misconduct/Court-overturns-conviction-chemist-Feng/102/web/2024/07 https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/misconduct/Court-over...
- psychoslave 2y agoLOL. Because those that make these laws pass and participate in the witch hunt turned into a justice show never lied about conflict of interest, what actual agenda they have in mind, and how much they really care abouto serving humanity best interests.
- no_exit 2y agoFTA: > At issue in the new ruling, issued 11 July, is whether Tao’s lack of disclosure about his affiliation with Fuzhou University in China affected federal agency funding decisions. The Denver appeals court agreed 2-1 that it was irrelevant because Tao had no grant proposals pending before those two agencies in question – the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation – at the time he made his affiliation statement.