Um, the article, within the first few paragraphs, admits that Rust would have actually prevented this particular outage. But we shouldn't point that out becaus

Um, the article, within the first few paragraphs, admits that Rust would have actually prevented this particular outage. But we shouldn't point that out because there could be other bugs that Rust would not have prevented? What a completely garbage argument with a premise that starts out with a bald-faced lie. Flagging and moving on.