3 ms·
+1 for trunk. In comparison with Vite, webpack, etc it's not as mature. Fewer plugins and stuff, but for the use cases it supports it's great. I use it to packa
by bippihippi1 2y ago
+1 for trunk.
In comparison with Vite, webpack, etc it's not as mature. Fewer plugins and stuff, but for the use cases it supports it's great.
I use it to package a static Yew frontend and it works with minimal fuss and has hot-reload for dev too.
- deciduously 2y agoI'm curious about "static Yew frontend ". If your content is static, why bother with a React-like tool, let alone one that compiles to wasm? Or have I misunderstood the term used here?
- eddd-ddde 2y agoStatic content does not imply non-interactive. Think video games, they can be fully static content yet highly interactive. It is the interactivity aspect of an app that makes it a good use case for something like yew or react. Since it is static, you don't need a server, but you can still benefit from the wasm performance and yew DX.
- deciduously 2y agoGreat example, thank you. I had indeed conflated "static" with "non-interactive," and I definitely see how Yew could be a great fit for this sort of content. I appreciate the clarification!