For small short-lived scripts the compilation (in any native form) time may be much bigger than bytecode execution time. And if a platform does not support dyna

For small short-lived scripts the compilation (in any native form) time may be much bigger than bytecode execution time. And if a platform does not support dynamic code generation the end result is non-functional code or interpreter inside interpreter for LINQ expressions (as they can still run as interpreted, at least they try). See a comment in Jint readme about that. I tried to compare some script languages implemented in C# with Roslyn script compilation. Same code to sum up 1M doubles. Roslyn takes almost 100ms to compile the code. This may become especially painful when source code changes on every execution and reusing compilation result is not possible for some reason, e.g. user input or parametrized string template.