> the three main points I took away from it were also contained in the gpt4o summary I think here's the key why some people like llm summaries while others don

> the three main points I took away from it were also contained in the gpt4o summary I think here's the key why some people like llm summaries while others don't. Two people can read an article and take away different points from it. If the llm summary contains the points you would have taken, you like it. If it didn't, you don't. (e.g. if I look at your kindle highlights for a book and compare them to mine, they'll be very different - this is why I find it hard to use a service like Blinkist - but I think a good llm like gpt-4o or claude 3.5 sonnet does as good a job as a wikipedia article would... Not sure what else people expect)