3 ms·
If you can't afford something, for you it does not exist. Linux does not exist for those managers and corporations for the specific use cases we're talking abou
by notepad0x90 2y ago
If you can't afford something, for you it does not exist. Linux does not exist for those managers and corporations for the specific use cases we're talking about. If you simply can't even get an applicant for a linux admin job in your hiring pipeline, what is the point of even pretending linux exists?
- shiroiushi 2y agoYou still haven't invalidated my point. The managers chose Windows, instead of choosing something else, like Linux, Mac, Sun, SGI, Cray, etc., for various reasons (possibly including cost, availability of qualified employees, etc.). They did not choose Windows because a bunch of devs from India were too poor to buy Macs, which was the original assertion.
- notepad0x90 2y agoI don't agree with the original assertion either. Yes, it was for various reasons, my point was it is not their responsibility to choose non-windows but rather the responsibility of Linux, mac ,sun,etc.. to make their product acceptable to the market.