Microsoft is so big that the CEO runs the company based on Friedman doctrine, aka their stock share holders are the driving force. Most stock share holders don'

Microsoft is so big that the CEO runs the company based on Friedman doctrine, aka their stock share holders are the driving force. Most stock share holders don't know the difference between OS designs or automation. Most are only able to read news clippings. Cannot remember the last time Microsoft Azure actually made non-tech news. Linux's share holders are the community around the developers and users. They want to continually make a better products. There are no stock holders to court. This is why Microsoft will not produce a more viable product that people are looking for in the server and embedded market. Their Oligarchy locks them into company IT infrastructure and PC gaming. I would also argue that Mac OS is a better personal OS when gaming is not a requirement but they are cost prohibited by the average person, so Microsoft eats that cake too.