3 ms·
the point is that you should not need to hover over the dates to get the exact ones. it hinders fast viewing of the data, when it is more than a small amount.
by fuzztester 2y ago
the point is that you should not need to hover over the dates to get the exact ones.
it hinders fast viewing of the data, when it is more than a small amount.
- buzzerbetrayed 2y agoDepends on the application and your personal preference. It's way "faster" for me to see a HN comment was posted "1 hour ago" than it is for me to see the absolute time string and do the math myself. Further, I don't care about the exact time a HN comment was made. I care about roughly how long ago it was posted so I know if the conversation is still going.
- teytra 2y agoBut if exact dates/time is shown you have the possibility to mentally subtract one hour from what the time is, and look for that. With 1 hour/week/month/year you cannot go the other way, it is too vague. But web pages and apps should provide a quick and easy way of changing between the too formats.
- fuzztester 2y agoyes, that's exactly what I said here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41039675 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41039675
- fuzztester 2y ago>With 1 hour/week/month/year you cannot go the other way, it is too vague. It's not just too vague, it's impossible in general. think about it, first, those who disagree.
- michaelcampbell 2y ago> the point is that you should not need to hover over the dates to get the exact ones. For you. For some, you should not need to hover over exact dates to get humanized relative deltas.
- fuzztester 2y agoso those of us who think differently from you are inhuman? /jk humans from long back, could, and still very much can, easily parse / grok those exact dates and do the trivial date arithmetic needed (just mentally, without even pen and paper, forget a calculator), in seconds, to figure out the deltas nearly perfectly, or at least close enough for their needs. just because you cannot do it, don't think that plenty of others cannot (analogous to what you said to me above). I have interacted with different types and categories of people, of various educational levels and socio-economic backgrounds, from so-called "low" to so-called quite "high", for many years now, and I can tell you that even uneducated farmers, fishermen, bike and car mechanics, and other kinds of manual labourers that I have met and interacted with a good amount, can easily do these kind of calculations in just a few seconds, mentally. not necessarily all, but many of them can.
- xp84 2y agoI’ve never looked at a datetime and thought to myself “if only I knew how long ago that was.” Are there really people like that? And actually, if I saw the date of “2023-12-07,” knowing it was last December actually gives me more information than “eight months ago” — because I know that means around Christmas time last year, and I know what other things happened last December, such as what features we were launching, who the product manager was at the time, etc. If you just shouted a random number of months ago, I would then have to stop and think about the answers to those questions. Lots of my memories could be placed in an approximate month or at least a season, and those never change after the fact. Relative dates are constantly changing and my memory does not increment all its records every month (e.g. “I’ve now worked here 9 months. I’ve now worked here 10 months.” But I can tell you the month and the year I started working here.) Relative dates are definitely a case of “just because we can do this doesn’t mean we should force everyone to use it”