Everyone gets the benefit of doubt, but there is enough evidence that Twitter's definition of "free speech" is just as selective after the takeover as before, i

Everyone gets the benefit of doubt, but there is enough evidence that Twitter's definition of "free speech" is just as selective after the takeover as before, it just changed the political direction. There are also enough reports of pretty stuff like disallowing links to competing networks, artificial slowing navigation to Washington Post articles, etc. None of that is very much in the spirit of free speech.