4 ms·
I see this as the victory sign of feminism. Women doesn't need men anymore so men are left on their own. Nothing wrong with that.
by unpopularopp 2y ago
I see this as the victory sign of feminism. Women doesn't need men anymore so men are left on their own. Nothing wrong with that.
- ashf023 2y agoBut the article talks about how the men are basically doing whatever they want and women are left as single mothers with multiple kids...
- mmaniac 2y agoIndependence achieved at last, for men and women.
- paulryanrogers 2y agoThat implies equal choice / responsibility for the kids. If men aren't required to contribute half the work -- or at least some financial equivalent -- then it's not really independence for women at all. And if the man discourages the woman from developing her own career, then leaves, she's been denied twice.
- galdosdi 2y agoAnd so atomized and isolated, we become easier pickings for big capital
- pwthornton 2y agoWhat kind of bum doesn't take care of your kids? That's no independence. That's a dereliction of duty. Pure incel talk. Pure loser talk. Who wants to go through life being a loser?
- mmaniac 2y agoIncels with kids? Get your narrative straight before you blow a gasket.
- piuantiderp 2y agoThere's a biological reality. Which btw, has been greatly tamed with contraceptives and what not, so the only thing left is individual failure.
- swagasaurus-rex 2y agoFinancial independence for the feminist movement was always about divesting from a husband, not relying on a husband.