2 ms·
The question I have is, why doesn't Windows have a way to allow booting still without the faulting kernel module? I know there's safe mode, but that's the nucl
by SirMaster 2y ago
The question I have is, why doesn't Windows have a way to allow booting still without the faulting kernel module?
I know there's safe mode, but that's the nuclear option, and safe mode isn't really "usable".
Couldn't a lot of this been avoided if Windows could just retry its boot after BSOD without the faulting module, and then they could push out a new module with a fix shortly after?