4 ms·
"These security agents will then be safe and unable to cause a Windows kernel crash." Unless of course there is a bug in eBPF (https://access.redhat.com/soluti
by kaliszad 2y ago
"These security agents will then be safe and unable to cause a Windows kernel crash."
Unless of course there is a bug in eBPF (https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7068083 https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7068083) @brendangregg and the kernel panics/ BSoDs anyway which you mention later in the article of course.
- acdha 2y agoThis is true but the kernel gets more scrutiny and has better priorities. Only CrowdStrike audits and hardens the CS kernel driver, so things like proactive improvements are competing in a single Jira board against marketing’s request for new features (want to bet that was all AI until Friday?) whereas the kernel eBPF implementation might be improved by people at other security vendors, distributions like Red Hat or Ubuntu or a major cloud provider (all of whom fund serious security audits and have engineers who care a lot about robustness), or academic researchers. “Many eyes” is a bit dubious in general but the Linux kernel is pretty much the best case for it being true.
- ec109685 2y agoBenefit of fixing that bug is that all ebpf programs benefit versus every security vendor needing to ensure they write perfect c code.