4 ms·
> Tyson Gay Shouldn't even be considered due to his history with doping.
by chakintosh 2y ago
> Tyson Gay
Shouldn't even be considered due to his history with doping.
- noarchy 2y ago>Shouldn't even be considered due to his history with doping. People are naive about how much sports are riddled with PEDs. It certainly isn't just Tyson Gay. You only know about the ones who get caught. But there is enough info out there to suggest that getting caught is just a matter of slipping up.
- chakintosh 2y agoI'm talking about him in relation to Usain Bolt. The latter is yet to be caught doping (if he is on juice to begin with).
- noarchy 2y ago>I'm talking about him in relation to Usain Bolt. The latter is yet to be caught doping (if he is on juice to begin with). Of the top men's 100m runners (in terms of times) only a few escaped the testing dragnet unscathed, one of which is Bolt. As entertaining as Bolt was to watch I have little faith that he was clean at his peak.
- SirMaster 2y agoI mean for fair competition no. But the article doesn't seem to be caring about that. Just how fast can a human possibly run. I don't know that chemical based enhancements should necessarily be off the table. But physical augmentations should probably be off the table.
- Grifnag 2y agoI think Bolt is the only one of the 5 sprinters named in the table in that article who hasn't tested positive or served some kind of ban for doping.