7/10, would have been 8/10 if I'd done them all the same way, which is just a gut reaction to whichever I immediately think is AI. I briefly let some detail co

7/10, would have been 8/10 if I'd done them all the same way, which is just a gut reaction to whichever I immediately think is AI. I briefly let some detail convince me to switch my vote on the first one (frog) and got it wrong, and from there decided I either needed to spend time with each image or go with my immediate gut belief. Gut is pretty good on these; spending the time to analyze probably even better, but spending just enough time to notice a detail or two will probably push accuracy to 50%. I don't really care that I got the aurora borealis wrong, those typically look unreal anyway, are usually long exposures, I have so little experience with the subject material. I also got the pangolin wrong, which was the only one aside from borealis where I had no strong gut feeling. I don't have an understanding why this one was harder for me. There's no way to run the experiment twice but if someone made a larger set I'd be curious to find out if I do better or worse on a desktop than on my phone (how I did these), I find my experience of images is extremely different between the two.