2 ms·
This is specifically addressed in the post you are replying to
by guipsp 2y ago
This is specifically addressed in the post you are replying to
- nkozyra 2y agoCan you elaborate? What I see about Linux is that Crowdstrike was in the process of adopting eBPF which is ostensibly immune to kernel panics, but that issue shows their eBPF implementation specifically causing a kernel panic.
- olddustytrail 2y agoYes, the elaboration is that the same link you posted is included in the article you're supposed to have just read.
- nkozyra 2y agoI've read it three times now. The only thing they say about it is this: "This doesn't mean that eBPF has solved nothing, substituting a vendor's bug for its own. Fixing these bugs in eBPF means fixing these bugs for all eBPF vendors, and more quickly improving the security of everyone." Which is exactly what I'm asking about. If eBPF has some inherent advantage, why did it fail in precisely the same way alreay?