I was hoping these were going to be actually good AI images, not those stereotypical cases where they screw up hands, smudge details, have cartoonish hyper-satu

I was hoping these were going to be actually good AI images, not those stereotypical cases where they screw up hands, smudge details, have cartoonish hyper-saturation/hyper-sharpness, have nonsense text, etc. This isn't really an interesting test. Side note: I doubt they are able to verify that none of the images were edited by a human. E.g. the Mt Fuji one is from Adobe Stock, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if it had reflections corrected by a human.