> Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above. You're right I should hav

> Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above. You're right I should have said that the document *shows* that he had nothing to do with it rather than *says* he had nothing to do with it. It's implicit not explicit. The doc includes 7 pages worth of contributor names (starting page xxv) and Trump is not one of them. So either way, it's careless to say that "Trump will dismantle our rights (see project 2025)" when he is not actually affiliated with Project 2025, as the document *shows*.