3 ms·
And assuming there's no bugs in the BPF code... Oh wait: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41031699 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41031699
by dijit 2y ago
And assuming there's no bugs in the BPF code...
Oh wait: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41031699 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41031699
- efee22 2y agoRHEL kernel.. right. Imho, I'd trust an upstream stable kernel far more than a RHEL one for production which has dozen of feature backports and an internal kABI to maintain.. granted RH has a QA team, but it is still impossible to test everything beforehand.
- worthless-trash 2y agoOn the upside, non root users can't insert ebpf code, so its a priv'ed operation, not like other distros.
- nequo 2y agoIsn’t it tied to CAP_BPF on every distro since the 5.8 kernel? https://mdaverde.com/posts/cap-bpf/ https://mdaverde.com/posts/cap-bpf/
- worthless-trash 2y agoRhel8 is based on 4.18 RHEL9 is based on 5.14 , i think it still has the same restriction ( kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled ). I reckon Red Hat may duplicate upstreams behavior by RHEL10.