> Doubly so when it's a personnel matter because the less said the better. I think it depends. There's probably a whole lot of reasons to select a specific com

> Doubly so when it's a personnel matter because the less said the better. I think it depends. There's probably a whole lot of reasons to select a specific communication strategy around an incident. If it's an obvious violation of coc, transparency is probably very well received. For example, if you have someone who's allegedly embezzling funds, just announce the investigation, and follow up one way or another. If it's a bogus claim, you better not be transparent about it. Because with transparency you're creating evidence against yourself, and that's not smart.