3 ms·
Then why not search for "the baseball team with the most wins" or "best baseball team historically", "baseball team most likely to win in 2025", etc.? With a q
by pickledoyster 2y ago
Then why not search for "the baseball team with the most wins" or "best baseball team historically", "baseball team most likely to win in 2025", etc.?
With a query like the one in your example, someone else might be completely justified in expecting to find the team with the best financials, the best little-league option for their child, etc.
I believe such queries are a perfect case of GIGO, and the amount of effort spent on optimizing for them instead of giving users more agency is what's driving down both the experience (bad results) and usability (little to none operators and explicit filters) of search engines as tools.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y ago> With a query like the one in your example, someone else might be completely justified in expecting to find the team with the best financials, the best little-league option for their child, etc. They would be, yes. My point is don't optimize for emotions, optimize for most probable interpretation of the query, and then yes, if it can be misconstrued, give me options, and give me a boat load of filters. I've been using the time filter in Google recently, I didn't even realize they had it because it's so well hidden.
- pickledoyster 2y agoyes, sadly, hiding functions and ignoring search operators has been a trend for Google.