4 ms·

I read all 920 pages.

by umbra07 2y ago

thunky 2y ago
Did you miss the part that says that Trump had nothing to do with it?
- defrost 2y ago
  > Did you miss the part that says that Trump had nothing to do with it? Which page number was that? In any case of course Trump had nothing to do with it, it was written for him not by him (as if). Trump also didn't plan and participate in the decade+ Federalist overthrow of SCOTUS .. that was handed to him on a plate. Like Project 2025.
  - thunky 2y ago
    > Which page number was that? The first sentence of the first paragraph: This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a collective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better > In any case of course Trump had nothing to do with it, it was written for him not by him (as if). Ok great, so he's free to read it or ignore it. Let's not treat the document as if it's Trump's own stated/promised policy then.
    - defrost 2y ago
      > The first sentence of the first paragraph: does not state that Trump had nothing to do with the document. Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above.
      - thunky 2y ago
        > Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above. You're right I should have said that the document *shows* that he had nothing to do with it rather than *says* he had nothing to do with it. It's implicit not explicit. The doc includes 7 pages worth of contributor names (starting page xxv) and Trump is not one of them. So either way, it's careless to say that "Trump will dismantle our rights (see project 2025)" when he is not actually affiliated with Project 2025, as the document *shows*.

I read all 920 pages.

thunky 2y ago

Did you miss the part that says that Trump had nothing to do with it?

defrost 2y ago
> Did you miss the part that says that Trump had nothing to do with it? Which page number was that? In any case of course Trump had nothing to do with it, it was written for him not by him (as if). Trump also didn't plan and participate in the decade+ Federalist overthrow of SCOTUS .. that was handed to him on a plate. Like Project 2025.
- thunky 2y ago
  > Which page number was that? The first sentence of the first paragraph: This work, Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, is a collective effort of hundreds of volunteers who have banded together in the spirit of advancing positive change for America. Our work is by no means the comprehensive compendium of conservative policies, nor is our group the exclusive cadre of conservative thinkers. The ideas expressed in this volume are not necessarily shared by all. What unites us is the drive to make our country better > In any case of course Trump had nothing to do with it, it was written for him not by him (as if). Ok great, so he's free to read it or ignore it. Let's not treat the document as if it's Trump's own stated/promised policy then.
  - defrost 2y ago
    > The first sentence of the first paragraph: does not state that Trump had nothing to do with the document. Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above.
    - thunky 2y ago
      > Which part explicity and clearly states Trump was not involved? You know, the part that you claimed existed in your comment above. You're right I should have said that the document *shows* that he had nothing to do with it rather than *says* he had nothing to do with it. It's implicit not explicit. The doc includes 7 pages worth of contributor names (starting page xxv) and Trump is not one of them. So either way, it's careless to say that "Trump will dismantle our rights (see project 2025)" when he is not actually affiliated with Project 2025, as the document *shows*.