3 ms·
Centralized grids are cheaper, which is even more important in the times of scarcity. There's no "20 meters of horse poo on the streets" for nuclear. It was al
by jojobas 2y ago
Centralized grids are cheaper, which is even more important in the times of scarcity.
There's no "20 meters of horse poo on the streets" for nuclear. It was always the way to go. If Chernobyl didn't happen, KGB would have it to secure the eternal demand for gas, oil and coal.
- Joel_Mckay 2y ago"Centralized grids are cheaper" I used to believe this too, but comparing Sydney/AU to Texas/US over the past decade has changed my perspective on distributed grid viability. The end users may simply have no better options available. =/