2 ms·
This completely ignores security incident response entirely. I don’t think removing the tools that slow or prevent a hack is the answer. I think it is unfair to
by aiisjustanif 2y ago
This completely ignores security incident response entirely. I don’t think removing the tools that slow or prevent a hack is the answer. I think it is unfair to call it crap if you have not dealt with security incidents.
Of all the lessons that could be learned from this, I think this not the best one. We don’t call for everyone to go back to having their own datacenter because AWS had a massive outage.
- jjk166 2y agoIf you run a hospital and find yourself unable to treat patients during an AWS outage, that should probably be a wake up call.
- groestl 2y ago> We don’t call for everyone to go back to having their own datacenter because AWS had a massive outage. We don't? Okay, well, probably not everyone.
- soraminazuki 2y ago> I don’t think removing the tools that slow or prevent a hack is the answer. No one ever said that. It's about removing tools that introduce a huge security risk for abysmal gain. Antiviruses are there for compliance and are detrimental to actual security as explained by GP.
- Khaine 2y agoCrowdStrike isn't just an anti-virus/malware solution. It also provides observability into the running processes. It integrates into threat intelligence so you can take hashes of known bad processes and see if it exists across your fleet of devices. It can isolate devices from a network and only allow the SOC access to investigate.