3 ms·
I saw a video on this, honestly just seems like it'd work. And if it doesn't, well, the bottom of the literal sea seems like a good place to put stuff to avoid
by QuiDortDine 2y ago
I saw a video on this, honestly just seems like it'd work. And if it doesn't, well, the bottom of the literal sea seems like a good place to put stuff to avoid people stumbling upon it.
- 1970-01-01 2y agoI've always thought piling it up in the middle of Antarctica would be best. Perhaps in another thousand years we can reuse it for some blackhole experiments or something.
- petermcneeley 2y agoIf we are here 1k years from now I am sure we can pick up up from the ocean again. Just like how we look through the trash of the Romans.
- senectus1 2y agothis issue then is, will dumping this stop it stumbling along people... ie we know nothing much about that area... who's to say it wont suddenly turn up on a beach or in fish or plant life after 50 years of being down there...?
- saagarjha 2y agoNot saying we know everything but we generally know of where geologically inactive regions are, and hadal habitats are pretty isolated.
- GeoAtreides 2y ago> who's to say it wont suddenly turn up on a beach or in fish or plant life after 50 years of being down there...? erm, the literal 10 kilometers of water above them? Also Mariana Trench is called a trench because is a trench. A trench 10 km deep.
- senectus1 2y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41036526 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41036526 We dont know what we dont know... what else do we not know?