7 ms·
https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno Seems alive to me. I know GitHub stars are not the ideal metric, but Deno dyin
by fallingsquirrel 2y ago
https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno
Seems alive to me.
I know GitHub stars are not the ideal metric, but Deno dying seems like an extraordinary claim that requires at least a little bit of evidence.
- josephg 2y agoPeople don't unstar projects on github. The metric to look for is the slope of that curve - how many new people get interested in deno each day? The slope of that curve is clearly trending downward.
- Equiet 2y agoComparing to Node it seems to be at about the same rate: https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno&nodejs/node&Date https://star-history.com/#denoland/deno&nodejs/node&Date. It's actually quite impressive how close it is.
- nine_k 2y agoFrom the chart, ∂{\star}/∂t remains pretty positive.
- ikesau 2y agoWhat's the typical curve for a project? I would have thought it would be like other technology adoption curves - surprised if it _wasn't_ logarithmic
- mr90210 2y agoLosing momentum != (Not being alive || Dying) Maybe it’s easier for you to understand the notation above.