I think this is an important thing to point out. This is the first really compelling test of the legal theory that the overbroad content-ownership boilerplate l

I think this is an important thing to point out. This is the first really compelling test of the legal theory that the overbroad content-ownership boilerplate licenses big user-generated-content hosts use could actually bind people to allow arbitrary use of their content, likeness, etc. Before the uses of it were actually quite egregious, but kind of abstract, things like "build a profile on you to advertise products" has incredibly deep and creepy implications but they're for whatever reason not as unifying an objection as this